How To Critique A Research Paper?

Research Paper


Evaluation of the research paper is assessing the research paper and locating its strengths as well as weaknesses. You have to use your critical analysing skills to write a critique of the research paper. In the first step, you should assess the source of the paper, such as who the subject audience is, whether this paper is peer-reviewed, when it was published, etc. It is crucial to ask questions about every part of the research paper and its purpose while critiquing it. This article presents components of the critiques and the questions you should ask yourself while critiquing each part of the research paper.
Components
of the Critique of a Research Paper

The Critiquing of the Research Paper Includes the Following;


1. Identification of the writer's position,
2. Arguments and findings,
3. Conclusions,
4. Evaluating the argument or hypothesis and pieces of evidence justifiably,
5. Locating the misexplanation of the information or data,
6. Locating the wrong or false assumptions,
7. Identifying the methods used for research,
8. And finding out weather the results and findings of the research paper are logical, have good evidence and are justifiable.
 

Critique of the Title

After analysing the source, you asses the title of the research paper to check whether it is descriptive enough to give you a clear image of the research. To do so, ask yourself whether the title depicts what the research is about, whether it is too long or too short, are the issues or variables, and if the relationships among them are mentioned.

Critique of the Introduction

The introduction of a research paper should present to the reader its research question or the problem statement, background of the research, and a clear depiction of the rationale for it. So an essay writing services company asks some questions from your self about the introduction, such as, is the problem statement easy to research, and is the research question worth conducting research. You should also assess whether the background is relevant to the problem statement, does the reader get the explicit depiction of the rationale of the research and is the objective of the study is clearly stated.
 

Critique of the Literature Review

The literature of a study should provide an overview of the existing literature related to the research question. It should depict the resemblances and variances between the past studies and must be organised to show how this research paper fits into the context of the past studies and fills the literature gap. For checking whether the literature has this content, one must assess whether the literature is broader and research question oriented at the same time. And whether there is historical and contemporary content related to the research question. Are there clear evidances on the opposing ideas or supporting ideas? Are the negative or upporting reviews are represented fairly. Does the literature utilize the theoracical framework and present the literature gaps that this research paper will fill? Because these questions are highly crucial for an effective research design.

Critique of the Methods and Research Design

The methodology of a research paper should present what the study did and how it did so. It should also let the reader assess the method utilized, reliability of the study, consistency of the data, research validity, and authenticity. This part of the research should comprise of the framework of approaches and methods taken to carry out research. Assess whether the research method and design have the rationale for choosing the method, process, approach, or tool. Check whether the research method is as per the research question and collected data is relted to the research question. Figuring out what the limitations of the study are is also an important factor.

Critique of the Findings

This segment of the research paper should include the results and findings of the study in brief detail so that they are easily understandable. This section should depict how the conclusions are made based on these results and findings. All the data collected from literature, in or out of the favour of the argument, should be mentioned. It should be depicted what the results of the research paper show. To criticaly analyse this part of the research, check whether the stages included in the analysis of data are explained and the if strategies are reasonable. Check if the data is detailed enough to conclude specific findings and if all the data is taken into consideration. And if not, then why it is not taken into consideration. Are the findings relating to the research question, and the graphs and tabular data providing a clear depiction of the results are also key parts of the critique.

Critique of the Discussion

This section of discussion within the research paper presents the findings of the results and explains them in the context of the research question. In this part, the framework of the research and findings are put together. It should comprise of a clear statement to aid the hypothesisi, or answers of the research question. There should not be repetitive knowledge in this section which has been discussed prior. According to the MD of dissertation writing services company, Comparison of the results within the research and other studies are discussed in this segment. To critically analyse this part, you should assess wheather it posseses these elements. Ask yourself whether the results, conclusions, and recommendations are drawn appropriately using data analysis. Do the results are align according to the argument, hypothesis, or research questions? Evaluate whether the findings are used to support or oppose the results of previous studies.

Critique of the Conclusion and References

The section of the conclusion should include the main points and effective use of the research. It should summarise the whole research, and although any new information should not be added in this part, future research areas can be recommended. To assess if the research paper answers the research questions, check whether the significant point of the research is drawn out. It also should be assessed that wether the conclusion illustrates the new idea related to the research question. The list of references should include all the references mentioned within the research paper and should be cited both clearly and correctly.

If you analyse each section of the research paper by critically aligning these parts and asking yourself the relevant questions, you can write a perfect critique following the above instructions.
Share on Google Plus

About Albert Barkley

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments :

Post a Comment